Glossary entry (derived from question below)
Russian term or phrase:
преюдиция
English translation:
res judicata
Added to glossary by
Frank Szmulowicz, Ph. D.
Nov 21, 2021 13:35
2 yrs ago
18 viewers *
Russian term
преюдиция
Russian to English
Law/Patents
Law (general)
Согласно статье 90 "Преюдиция" УПК Российской Федерации (в редакции Федерального закона от 29 декабря 2009 года N 383-ФЗ) обстоятельства, установленные вступившим в законную силу приговором либо иным вступившим в законную силу решением суда, принятым в рамках гражданского, арбитражного или административного судопроизводства, признаются судом, прокурором, следователем, дознавателем без дополнительной проверки; при этом такие приговор или решение не могут предрешать виновность лиц, не участвовавших ранее в рассматриваемом уголовном деле.
...
1. Collateral Estoppel (res judicata - курсивом)
2. Prejudice (тоже есть в словаре).
Что выбрать?
...
1. Collateral Estoppel (res judicata - курсивом)
2. Prejudice (тоже есть в словаре).
Что выбрать?
Proposed translations
(English)
3 +2 | res judicata | Frank Szmulowicz, Ph. D. |
3 +1 | Prejudice | Lesia Kutsenko |
Change log
Nov 26, 2021 13:34: Frank Szmulowicz, Ph. D. Created KOG entry
Proposed translations
+2
18 mins
Selected
res judicata
The definition of res judicata fits the definition of the Russian term.
cccccccccc
Res judicata (RJ) or res iudicata, also known as claim preclusion, is the Latin term for "a matter decided" and refers to either of two concepts in both civil law and common law legal systems: a case in which there has been a final judgment and is no longer subject to appeal; and the legal doctrine meant to bar (or preclude) relitigation of a claim between the same parties.
Angelo Gambiglioni, De re iudicata, 1579
In the case of res judicata, the matter cannot be raised again, either in the same court or in a different court. A court will use res judicata to deny reconsideration of a matter.[1]
The doctrine of res judicata is a method of preventing injustice to the parties of a case supposedly finished but perhaps also or mostly a way of avoiding unnecessary waste of judicial resources. Res judicata does not merely prevent future judgments from contradicting earlier ones, but also prevents litigants from multiplying judgments, and confusion.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Res_judicata
cccccccccccccccc
Generally, res judicata is the principle that a cause of action may not be relitigated once it has been judged on the merits. "Finality" is the term which refers to when a court renders a final judgment on the merits.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/res_judicata
cccccccccccccccccccc
res judicata, (Latin: “a thing adjudged”), a thing or matter that has been finally juridically decided on its merits and cannot be litigated again between the same parties. The term is often used in reference to the maxim that repeated reexamination of adjudicated disputes is not in any society’s interest.
It has long been held that one judicial contest is enough for the litigants on a particular claim or defense. As the volume of judicial work has risen, the need to limit litigants to a single contest about a single controversy has become more urgent. The concept of res judicata has expanded in scope and power as the courts have refined its operation.
https://www.britannica.com/topic/res-judicata
cccccccccc
Res judicata (RJ) or res iudicata, also known as claim preclusion, is the Latin term for "a matter decided" and refers to either of two concepts in both civil law and common law legal systems: a case in which there has been a final judgment and is no longer subject to appeal; and the legal doctrine meant to bar (or preclude) relitigation of a claim between the same parties.
Angelo Gambiglioni, De re iudicata, 1579
In the case of res judicata, the matter cannot be raised again, either in the same court or in a different court. A court will use res judicata to deny reconsideration of a matter.[1]
The doctrine of res judicata is a method of preventing injustice to the parties of a case supposedly finished but perhaps also or mostly a way of avoiding unnecessary waste of judicial resources. Res judicata does not merely prevent future judgments from contradicting earlier ones, but also prevents litigants from multiplying judgments, and confusion.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Res_judicata
cccccccccccccccc
Generally, res judicata is the principle that a cause of action may not be relitigated once it has been judged on the merits. "Finality" is the term which refers to when a court renders a final judgment on the merits.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/res_judicata
cccccccccccccccccccc
res judicata, (Latin: “a thing adjudged”), a thing or matter that has been finally juridically decided on its merits and cannot be litigated again between the same parties. The term is often used in reference to the maxim that repeated reexamination of adjudicated disputes is not in any society’s interest.
It has long been held that one judicial contest is enough for the litigants on a particular claim or defense. As the volume of judicial work has risen, the need to limit litigants to a single contest about a single controversy has become more urgent. The concept of res judicata has expanded in scope and power as the courts have refined its operation.
https://www.britannica.com/topic/res-judicata
4 KudoZ points awarded for this answer.
Comment: "Thank you, Frank!"
+1
8 mins
Prejudice
Peer comment(s):
agree |
Oleg Lozinskiy
13 mins
|
Thank you very much, Oleg!
|
|
neutral |
Tatyana Peruzzi
: В статье по приведённой Вами ссылке рассматривается использование слова в контексте вопроса предвзятости при принятии решения... что не соответствует определению в вопросе...
1 day 6 hrs
|
Уважаемый Олег обосновал prejudice и в последующих вопросах аскер использует prejudice, it seems
|
Reference comments
21 mins
Reference:
CRIMINAL-PROCEDURAL CODE
OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION
NO. 174-FZ OF DECEMBER 18, 2001
(with the Amendments and Additions of May 29, July 24, 25, October 31, 2002, June 30, July 4, 7, December 8, 2003, April 22, June 29, December 2, 28, 2004, June 1, 2005)
Article 90. Prejudice
The circumstances, established by the sentence which has come into legal force, shall be recognized by the court, by the prosecutor, by the investigator and by the inquirer without an additional verification, unless these circumstances raise the court's doubts. Such sentence, however, cannot prejudge the guilt of the persons, who have not taken part in the criminal case under consideration earlier.
https://www.google.ru/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd...
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 25 мин (2021-11-21 14:01:42 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
https://www.legislationline.org/documents/section/criminal-c...
https://www.google.ru/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd...
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 34 мин (2021-11-21 14:10:37 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
В англоязычных версиях УПК РФ, размещенных на веб-сайтах ВОИС, ВТО и www.legislationline.org, статья 90 переведена так, как указано выше.
OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION
NO. 174-FZ OF DECEMBER 18, 2001
(with the Amendments and Additions of May 29, July 24, 25, October 31, 2002, June 30, July 4, 7, December 8, 2003, April 22, June 29, December 2, 28, 2004, June 1, 2005)
Article 90. Prejudice
The circumstances, established by the sentence which has come into legal force, shall be recognized by the court, by the prosecutor, by the investigator and by the inquirer without an additional verification, unless these circumstances raise the court's doubts. Such sentence, however, cannot prejudge the guilt of the persons, who have not taken part in the criminal case under consideration earlier.
https://www.google.ru/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd...
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 25 мин (2021-11-21 14:01:42 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
https://www.legislationline.org/documents/section/criminal-c...
https://www.google.ru/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd...
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 34 мин (2021-11-21 14:10:37 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
В англоязычных версиях УПК РФ, размещенных на веб-сайтах ВОИС, ВТО и www.legislationline.org, статья 90 переведена так, как указано выше.
Something went wrong...